EnergyEcoLab
  • RESEARCH LINES
  • PROJECTS
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • TEAM
  • COURSES AND SEMINARS
  • NEWS
  • OUTREACH
CEPR 1
17 September, 2020

IT PAYS TO BE PREPARED. New Discussion Paper on how to prepare for the next crisis

Why were European states so unprepared for the Covid-19 pandemic, lacking both a coherent strategy and adequate preventative measures? And what can be done to ensure the necessary cooperation, preparation, and resilience for future adverse shocks? States, by their very nature, have a ‘universalistic duty’ to prepare preventative measures for all kinds of crises. These include a robust primary health care system, a strong logistics network, emergency decision-making bodies that combine legitimacy (elected politicians) with expertise (expert advice), and institutions that promote cooperation among countries or regions.

And yet, the Covid-19 crisis has highlighted the potential for severe market failures in the provision of essential goods and services during pandemics and other negative shocks with major impact. Across Europe, there has been acute shortages of medical supplies essential for dealing with the pandemic. Collapsing supply chains and non-existent stockpiling, an over-reliance on production from China, and inadequate government policies have all contributed to this systematic failure. While catastrophic events are difficult to avoid, society must strive to be better prepared for the next one.

Natalia Fabra, together with Massimo Motta, ICREA-Universitat Pompeu Fabra and Barcelona Graduate School of Economics and CEPR Research Fellow, and Martin Peitz, University of Mannheim and MaCCI, have just released a  new CEPR Policy Insight, in which they analyze the private and state incentives to take adequate measures before and during a crisis triggered by an adverse shock. They argue that private initiatives are often insufficient to be prepared for rare events with a large negative effect. Instead, governments and international institutions should implement mechanisms which ensure that prevention, detection and mitigation measures are taken.

The findings in this Policy Insight demonstrate that the necessary preparation for catastrophic events should consist of an articulated strategy, which goes from having an adequate research infrastructure and human capital to investing in prevention, and from early detection (in order to mitigate their impact) to building the ability to react should such events materialise. It may be that neither market institutions (e.g. insurance markets) nor an individual country’s initiatives are sufficient to achieve this alone. A strategy based on private (even if mandatory) insurance is likely to be insufficient and difficult to implement. Instead, a resilience strategy should rely on public authorities securing the provision of essential goods in sufficient quantity and quality. This requires putting in place competitive mechanisms to accumulate essential goods, establishing rationing protocols, and facilitating rapid production when the crisis hits.

The report also stresses the importance of fostering ‘Social capital’ to face disasters, which includes building trust in public institutions, a well-functioning administration, and society’s willingness to listen to science and follow public recommendations. In particular, the economics of electricity capacity markets provides important lessons for the provision of essential goods in such events – as a general principle, it is likely that a centralised and targeted mechanism, such as a system of strategic reserves to be procured through auctions, would perform well in most cases.

“These lessons are relevant to coping with the ongoing Covid-19 threat as well as with any future crisis of as yet unknown nature”

The Column summarizing their work can be read here https://voxeu.org/article/building-strategy-resilience

The Policy Insight is available here  https://cepr.org/active/publications/policy_insights/viewpi.php?pino=106

EARIE 2020 – Keynote Lecture Sostenibilidad: ¿marketing o concienciación?

Related Posts

energy-workshop-2023-banniere

Uncategorized

Energy Workshop at the Toulouse School of Economics in October 2023

car_sharing_pequena

Uncategorized

Examining the trade-offs of car-sharing in cities: mobility alternatives, congestion, and pollution

Uncategorized

Yale Climate, Environment & Economic Growth Conference 2023

Search

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @@EnergyEcoLab

Recent Posts

  • energy-workshop-2023-banniereEnergy Workshop at the Toulouse School of Economics in October 2023
    15 September, 2023
  • car_sharing_pequenaExamining the trade-offs of car-sharing in cities: mobility alternatives, congestion, and pollution
    14 September, 2023
  • panoglobe ShutterstockYale Climate, Environment & Economic Growth Conference 2023
    8 September, 2023

Archives

  • September 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
EnergyEcoLab
  • Home
  • Research Lines
  • Projects
  • Publications
  • Team
  • Courses and Seminars
  • News
  • Outreach
  • Contact
energyecolab@gmail.com | Universidad Carlos III de Madrid | C/Madrid 126, 28903 Getafe, Madrid | +34 91 624 57 36